I recently went to a luncheon where DU professor Nancy Wadsworth discussed the role of race and religion in American politics. The overlap with themes in our class was unbelievable, but one of the things that stuck with me the most was Wadsworth’s comments about intersectionality and the importance of religion.
When politicians
only fall into one subordinate group (i.e. Mitt Romney’s affiliation with Mormonism,
but still in the dominant for gender, race, class, and ability), it seems as if
he/she has an easier time integrating into mainstream acceptance. On the other side are candidates who are
marginalized on several levels, even if not necessarily warranted. For example, Barack Obama was constantly
framed as ‘the other’, criticized for being too black OR not black enough; too
Christian OR not Christian enough; targeted as a Muslim; too foreign, etc. These attacks on different aspects of Obama’s
identity began to symbolize who Americans thought should or should not be
president.
Relating
back to an earlier reading, “Critical Junctures in Intercultural Communication
Studies: A Review” by Halualani , Mendoza & Drzewiecka, this most recent
election demonstrated the importance of cultural intersection by ‘examining
culture through the concepts of historical context and power relations.’ If one doesn’t perfectly fit into the
dominant cultural identity of the U.S., s/he faces more obstacles in reaching
positions of power. Prior to the luncheon
I had not really thought about religion as being such an important factor in
elections, but looking back at history, religion is oftentimes viewed as a race
and marginalized as such (i.e. Irish Catholics). Even with supposedly universal access to First
Amendment rights, freedom of religion as been racialized. Whereas Catholics, Jews and Protestants were
once marginalized in politics, but have since moved inside the circle of acceptance,
atheists, indigenous religions, Buddhist Chinese and Muslims (religious groups
associated with people of color) still remain on the outskirts of that same
circle.
Do you think that religion still plays as important of a role in
politics as it did in our parents’ and grandparents’ generations? Could the U.S. ever elect a Buddhist or
Muslim president?
No comments:
Post a Comment