I came across this video on the main page of CNN’s
website today titled “Magazine sorry for model with blackface”. The
video, linked above, talks about a recent spread in the French magazine Numero which depicts a white model in
what appears to be blackface with the text “African Queen” next to her picture.
The reporters dialogue and the statements from both Numero magazine and the photographer who
shot the picture remind me of the dialogue we had and heard about in class on
February 6th regarding the Pete Hoekstra Super Bowl ad. If you recall, the
Super Bowl ad featured a young Asian girl and was seen as offensive by many
people in how it depicted a minority. The photographer for Numero states that it was never his intention to be offensive and
he had a different goal for the image, and that the editors added the text
without his knowledge. This argument sounds similar to some expressed about the
intentionality of the Hoekstra ad and whether they meant to be offensive. We also
discussed what responsibility the young actress had in the Hoekstra video,
debating if it was her fault to have participated. In this video, the reporters
cite the model’s young age and lack of awareness in her defense, two arguments
also used to defend the Asian actress in the Hoekstra video.
Although similar events have happened with magazines
in the United States, because this image was published in a French magazine, does
this have any implications for race relations and how race is seen in France? I
mentioned before in class that while living in France I saw students dressed in
blackface to school for Halloween and no one responded at all to that, as if it
is perfectly normal and acceptable, whereas a child in the United States would
be punished and sent home from school. This makes me wonder what (if any)
response there was in France to this spread. As author Bai states in his article “Constructing
Racial Groups’ Identities in the Diasporic Press: Internalization, Resonance,
Transparency, and Offset” (reading from 2/6), “the media help to define what
race is and what meanings the imagery of race carries” (p. 388). What does this
image show about perceptions of race today?
The photographer (whether he is telling the truth or
not we don’t know) said that the picture was meant simply to be a woman with
tanned bronze skin and he was not aware of the “African Queen” text. If this is
true, why did the magazine editors choose to include the tanned model and the “African
Queen” text together? If it was really the intention of the magazine to have an
image of an African queen, why did they not just use a dark-skinned model of
African descent? Would the image have been a controversy if the text “African
Queen” was not included? Would it still be considered blackface or would it
just be an image of a tan model? Do you think the magazine and photographer's explanations/apologies for the spread are acceptable? Who is to blame in this situation: the
photographer, the model, or the magazine editors? Or is larger society to blame
for the prevalence of white models over models of color in magazines and at New
York Fashion Week?
No comments:
Post a Comment